GERİ | Paylaş | 568 |
Bu makaleyi çevirerek ülkemizde ki sınırlı kaynakları geliştirmek adına bize yardımcı olabilirsin. Yapacağınız çeviriler iletişim bilgilerinizle beraber yayınlanacaktır.
Bize ulaşın lütfen.
Warnings
This solution is described here because it is often seen in use. It has poor ergonomics and a high risk of error.
- Simplicity of the system and its installation
- Low equipment cost
Disadvantages:
- The second rope cannot be considered a belay system unless the climber is continuously connected to it A Y-lanyard must be used and the user must be clipped to the next knot before unclipping from the last knot.
- Average ease of use: the climber lifts the secondary rope with each move upwards, and supports its weight
- In case topping out is necessary to exit the route, retrieving a rope with many knots in it could be complicated or even dangerous
Risks in case of primary ascender malfunction:
- Significant potential fall length
- With an I-lanyard, the secondary belay system is not continuous
Close to the belay station, there is a risk of a fall factor 1: beware if the rope is semi-static.
With a static lanyard, the fall factor close to the belay station can be greater than 1. (A dynamic rope lanyard is preferred.)
Hedef 200 eğitim videosu
Tırmanış konusunda her hafta yeni bir bilgi için abone olun